Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
10897232 | Cancer Epidemiology | 2015 | 6 Pages |
Abstract
The clinical benefit at first evaluation from systemic treatment in MBC does not predict for subsequent treatment benefit in this retrospective analysis. The fact that 61% of patients did not receive subsequent treatment after previous treatment failure suggests that either clinical judgement is of critical value in selection of patients to prevent them from unnecessary toxicity or, alternatively indicates that based on the assumption that prior treatment failure predicts for lack of benefit undertreatment of patients occurs. Therefore, a more adequate clinical judgement tool or predictive biomarkers for response are urgently needed to improve treatment outcome.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Cancer Research
Authors
J.L. Bakker, K. Wever, J.H. van Waesberghe, A. Beeker, H. Meijers-Heijboer, I.R. Konings, H.M.W. Verheul,