| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10918067 | Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2015 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
MC calculations revealed (i) that DIBH compared with FB can significantly reduce the dose to the OARs even if the treatment planning is carried out with AAA, and (ii) inferior target dose coverage compared to AAA, irrespectively of FB and DIBH. The dose deviations were similar for FB and DIBH. The observed inferior target dose coverage relates therefore to the treatment planning algorithm rather than breathing technique.
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Cancer Research
Authors
Wiviann Ottosson, Patrik Sibolt, Christina Larsen, Jon A. Lykkegaard Andersen, Svetlana Borissova, Anders Mellemgaard, Claus F. Behrens,