Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1097960 International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 2013 23 Pages PDF
Abstract

•The risk of wrongful conviction leads the US and China to reform the death penalty.•This article mainly compares the relevant reforms undertaken in each country.•It is necessary that China adopt more substantive reforms to match the US's success.•China should immediately suspend all executions until adequate reforms carried out.•China should completely abolish the death penalty and create effective mechanisms.

In recent years, both China and the United States (US) have discovered numerous wrongful convictions, including several cases in which innocent people have been sentenced to death. These discoveries have led both countries to reform the death penalty but the extent and nature of the reforms in each country have been greatly different. This article explores the similarities and differences between the nature of wrongful convictions in death penalty cases in China and the US. It will also compare the reforms undertaken in each country. On the whole, the US has made greater progress in the prevention and correction of wrongful convictions involving the death penalty, especially in the areas of evidentiary rules and post-conviction review. In order for China to match America's success, it is necessary that China adopt more substantive reforms. China should learn from America's experience and should continue to adopt international standards of criminal justice, such as due process rights, the presumption of innocence and the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence. In the interim, China should immediately suspend all executions until adequate reforms can be carried out. Ultimately, China should surpass the US in criminal-justice reform and in the field of human rights protection by completely abolishing the death penalty and creating a more effective mechanism for criminal punishment.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Social Sciences Law
Authors
,