| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1103117 | Language Sciences | 2013 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Different approaches to universals and variation are discussed in the context of a distinction, proposed by Burton-Roberts (2000), between a generic conception of the notion ‘language’, in which the study of language is the study of human languages (such as English and French), and a naturalistic conception, in which ‘language’ is used to denote a biological entity, a specifically linguistic innate module of mind, distinct from socio-political entities such as French and English. This is related to the notion of structural analogy, and to the status and role of corpora and intuitive well-formedness judgments in phonology. It is also related to the notion of the grounding of syntax and phonology.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
Language and Linguistics
Authors
Philip Carr,
