Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1103597 | Language Sciences | 2009 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
In revisiting Bolozky's [Bolozky, Shmuel, 1979. On the new imperative in colloquial Hebrew. Hebrew Annual Review 3, 17-24] and Bat-El's [Bat-El, Outi, 2002. True truncation in colloquial Hebrew imperatives. Language 78(4), 651-683] analyses of colloquial Hebrew imperatives, the article argues for restricting Imperative Truncation to the morphologically-triggered process of #tV prefix elision (or even to just #t prefixes). Elision of e and i in imperatives is claimed to be effected by the general, phonetically-motivated elision of the same vowels in casual speech. The prominence and sonority of the vowel a protects it from elision in imperatives, and short forms like kum 'get up!' are not derived from their takum counterparts, but rather borrowed from the normative register.
Keywords
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
Language and Linguistics
Authors
Shmuel Bolozky,