Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1106750 Transportation Research Procedia 2014 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

Pedestrian and crowd-movement models are difficult to validate using traditional empirical methods because of data-related issues such as generalizability, collection ethics, and costs. Commonly used validation methods make strong assumptions about emergence and the importance of crowd structure, leaving a gap in validation literature. The paper reviews the most common methods of validating pedestrian models and proposes a hybridized qualitative approach to validating models that covers more complex group dynamics and possible situations of panic.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Social Sciences Safety Research