Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1115491 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014 9 Pages PDF
Abstract

Problem StatementThere is no comprehensive tool capturing general vulnerability to biases caused by the use of heuristics. Existing tools focus only on one specific bias or on personality traits.Research QuestionsCan general vulnerability to heuristic thinking be assessed and what are the sub-dimensions of this construct? Can undergraduate students be successfully involved in the research process?Purpose of the StudyTo demonstrate the results of an educational experiment in which undergraduate students are involved in the first stage of development of the Heuristics and Biases Scale (HBS).Research MethodsAfter getting acquainted with the underlying theory, students chose one specific bias or heuristic, investigated related results of the experiments and paradigms. At the later stage, under supervision, students developed items intended to capture the chosen bias. Finally, positively evaluated items were combined together and piloted. The psychometrical properties of the items and course outcomes were assessed.FindingsDeveloped items formed scales with satisfactory reliability. Course received positive student evaluations, and the assessment indicated that the majority of students achieved intended learning outcomes.ConclusionsThe study indicates that it is possible to develop a psychometrically sound assessment to measure vulnerability to a range of common cognitive biases. Moreover, it is also possible to successfully involve undergraduate students in the development of a psychometrical tool.AcknowledgmentsAuthors would like to thank the Students of University College Roosevelt contributing to this work as their Independent Research Projects or as a part of Social Psychology or Statistics Course.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Arts and Humanities Arts and Humanities (General)