Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1120114 Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012 13 Pages PDF
Abstract

The permanent changes in the dynamics of discourse marker use in conversation triggers the necessity of re(modeling) the already existing patterns of analysis in such a way as to adapt them to the new discursive realities and practices. The best analysis of discourse marking functions and discursive roles can be done in real instances of conversation. Therefore, the corpus on which the analysis is performed is composed of conversations in Romanian, my own samples of recorded conversation between Romanian speakers. The analysis of discourse markers in conversation requires a pragmatic-functional perspective. Hence, I suggest a different classification of the discursive attributions that discourse markers have in conversation by advocating for the pragmatic-functional categories of discursive roles and discursive functions. These two categories, in which the various discursive attributions of markers were placed, represent the framework for the analysis of the discourse markers “deci” and “şi” which is conducted in this paper. Furthermore, a presentation of the discursive functions and roles of two of the most frequently used Romanian discourse markers: “deci” and “şi” will be made. The functions and roles of these markers are supported by relevant illustrative examples which demonstrate the importance of the conversational context in establishing the pragmatic role that markers could have in casual and formal conversations.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Arts and Humanities Arts and Humanities (General)