| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11263455 | International Journal of Law and Psychiatry | 2018 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Quantitative and qualitative results suggest that the presence of neuroscience data in an expert report affects judges' perceptions of the quality, credibility, and scientificity (reliability, objectivity, scientific basis) of the report, and the persuasiveness of the evidence it provided. Moreover, this phenomenon was stronger in more experienced judges than in less experienced judges.
Keywords
Related Topics
Health Sciences
Medicine and Dentistry
Forensic Medicine
Authors
Valerie Moulin, Caroline Mouchet, Tessa Pillonel, G.-M. Gkotsi, Bernard Baertschi, Jacques Gasser, Benoit Testé,