Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1128463 Poetics 2011 20 Pages PDF
Abstract

This paper focuses on one of the factors that appears to be important in several conceptualizations of how to approach the digital divide: the differential possession of so-called Internet skills. Three large-scale performance tests are conducted to reveal the contributions of gender, age, educational level of attainment, Internet experience, and amount of Internet use on both medium- and content-related Internet skills. Age appears to have a negative influence on medium-related skills. However, there is a positive contribution to the level of content-related skills, meaning that older generations perform better than the younger. Unfortunately, they are impeded by their low level of medium-related skills in such a way that the actual result is negative. This noteworthy conclusion, to our knowledge, has hardly received any attention in digital divide research. Educational attainment appears significant for both medium- and content-related Internet skills. This conclusion contrasts somewhat with other research that claims that people learn digital skills more in practice than in formal educational settings. Internet experience only contributes to medium-related skills. It appears that content-related skills do not grow with years of Internet experience and the number of hours spent online weekly. The latter only has some effect on medium-related skills.

Research highlights► Two categories of Internet skills—medium- and content-related—are defined and measured. ► Age negatively contributes to medium-related skills, but positively to content-related skills. ► Due to a lack of medium-related skills, older people are limited in their content-related skills. ► The unpleasant assumption that the skill problem will solve itself with the loss of seniors is false. ► For learning content-related Internet skills, formal educational settings are a prerequisite.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Arts and Humanities Arts and Humanities (General)
Authors
, , ,