Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1129331 | Social Networks | 2012 | 7 Pages |
Chua (2011) argues that in a meritocratic context, institutions restrict the usefulness of social networks in exerting influence on job seekers’ earnings. Regressing job-finding via personal contacts on earnings, he finds negative effects of influence via personal contacts, especially for the well-educated and individuals working in the state sector. In this comment, I argue that these results are ambiguous because (1) the analysis does not sufficiently distinguish between job ‘search’ methods and job ‘finding’ methods, (2) job-finding method indicates information flow rather than a personal contact's influence, and (3) it remains unclear whether Chua's analysis reflects the effect of network usage in job search per se or the effect of self-selection into network usage by individuals with low earning potential.
► Chua (2011) argues that in a meritocratic context, institutions restrict the usefulness of social networks in exerting influence on job seekers’ earnings. ► His empirical analysis finds a negative correlation between job-finding method “personal contacts” and wages. ► I argue that this result does not unambiguously support his proposition. ► I point out some possible changes to the research strategy that could help to alleviate this problem.