Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1134814 Computers & Industrial Engineering 2012 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

This paper runs extensive numerical experiments to find the global redistribution-effective carbon tax regime. We discuss two broad categories of schemes, namely, the bottom-up type constant-rate and top-down type constant-revenue ones. On a comparable basis, we compare these two broad categories of schemes using the notion of elasticity. We conclude that, in both the bottom-up and top-down paradigms, progressive schemes has the largest redistribution effects in terms of reducing global inequality. Exemption has a V-shaped pattern in equalizing. We recommend a constant-revenue type carbon tax with small amount of emissions exemption for every country as the most pro-poor scheme.

► This paper runs extensive experiments to find the global redistribution-effective carbon tax regime. ► We find exemption has a V-shaped pattern in equalizing for both the constant-rate and constant-revenue carbon-tax regimes. ► We recommend a constant-revenue type carbon tax with small amount of emissions exemption for every country as the most pro-poor scheme.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Engineering Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Authors
, ,