Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1151213 | Statistical Methodology | 2006 | 14 Pages |
This is a comparative study of various clustering and classification algorithms as applied to differentiate cancer and non-cancer protein samples using mass spectrometry data. Our study demonstrates the usefulness of a feature selection step prior to applying a machine learning tool. A natural and common choice of a feature selection tool is the collection of marginal pp-values obtained from tt-tests for testing the intensity differences at each m/zm/z ratio in the cancer versus non-cancer samples. We study the effect of selecting a cutoff in terms of the overall Type 1 error rate control on the performance of the clustering and classification algorithms using the significant features. For the classification problem, we also considered m/zm/z selection using the importance measures computed by the Random Forest algorithm of Breiman. Using a data set of proteomic analysis of serum from ovarian cancer patients and serum from cancer-free individuals in the Food and Drug Administration and National Cancer Institute Clinical Proteomics Database, we undertake a comparative study of the net effect of the machine learning algorithm–feature selection tool–cutoff criteria combination on the performance as measured by an appropriate error rate measure.