The perception of place and the ‘origins of handedness’ debate: towards a cognitive cartography of science in late-Victorian Dublin

•Geographical approaches are employed to illuminate history of science in the city.•Two nineteenth-century medical papers on ‘handedness’ penned in Dublin are examined.•The city life-spaces of the two authors are investigated in relation to their assertions.•Their individual perceptions of Dublin are found to inflect on their scientific research.

In 1884, a medical paper entitled ‘Consideration of the Structural and Acquisitional Elements in Dextral Pre-Eminence’ penned by the Dublin physician George Sigerson, appeared in the Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy. A number of years later, the Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland presented a similar piece by Dublin anatomist Daniel John Cunningham, on the topic of ‘Right-Handedness and Left-Brainedness’. For the late nineteenth-century scientific community, these articles represented two Dublin-based contributions to a long-running and wide-ranging debate on the origins of handedness. However, by building on the geographical premise that scientific knowledge bears the imprint of its location and that place matters in the way scientific claims come to be sanctioned, this paper probes, not merely an encounter with evolutionary science in the less well explored domain of fin de siècle Dublin, but more crucially, how these local reviews of manual dexterity were in part shaped by the scientists’ differing perceptions of their city. By attending to the lives of Sigerson and Cunningham and focusing on the interplay between life-space, city-space and science, it underscores the critical role of place and space in the reception, circulation and mobilisation of scientific knowledge in the city.