| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1158961 | History of European Ideas | 2011 | 8 Pages | 
Abstract
												Analytic ethics in the central period - extending from the beginning of the twentieth century to post-World War II linguistic analysis - is too often construed by historians and philosophers alike in monolithic terms as the emotivism of A. J. Ayer. In contrast, we argue that a multiplicity of ethical doctrines were developed by analytic philosophers at this time of which Ayer's emotivism was just one. Moreover, we maintain that this multiplicity of ethical doctrines was itself the result of a multiplicity of conceptions of analysis and that connecting these two sets of beliefs makes for the best understanding of analytic ethics.
											Keywords
												
											Related Topics
												
													Social Sciences and Humanities
													Arts and Humanities
													History
												
											Authors
												Mark Bevir, Jason Blakely, 
											