Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1159198 | History of European Ideas | 2007 | 17 Pages |
Abstract
Vattel's Law of Nations (1758) claimed that a system of independent states could maintain the liberty of each without undermining the ideal of an international society. The chief institution serving this purpose was the balance of power. In Vattel's account, the balance of power could be stabilized if it operated primarily through a process of commercial preferences and restrictions. These limits on how states ought to defend themselves were grounded in Vattel's thoroughly forgotten writings on the mid-eighteenth-century luxury debates, which addressed the political economy of reforming the state and pacifying the international order. An examination of Vattel's Law of Nations in this context shows that his approach to the law of nations should not be dismissed as a capitulation to the harsh reality of international politics.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
History
Authors
Isaac Nakhimovsky,