Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1160267 Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2016 8 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Summary of certain aspects of Paul Feyerabend's account of the development of Western rationalism.•Comparison of his account to that of Karl Popper.•Whether what Feyerabend called his ‘story’ constitutes a possible history of our epistemic concepts and their trajectory.

I summarize certain aspects of Paul Feyerabend's account of the development of Western rationalism, show the ways in which that account is supposed to run up against an alternative, that of Karl Popper, and then try to give a preliminary comparison of the two. My interest is primarily in whether what Feyerabend called his ‘story’ constitutes a possible history of our epistemic concepts and their trajectory. I express some grave reservations about that story, and about Feyerabend's framework, finding Popper's views less problematic here. However, I also suggest that one important aspect of Feyerabend's material, his treatment of religious belief, can be given an interpretation which makes it tenable, and perhaps preferable to a Popperian approach.

Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities Arts and Humanities History
Authors
,