Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1160606 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A | 2006 | 13 Pages |
Abstract
The detection of extrasolar planets presents a good case in which to clarify the distinction between observation and inference from evidence. By asking whether these planets have been observed or inferred from evidence, and by using the scientific details to answer the question, we will get a clearer understanding of the epistemic difference between these two forms of information. The issue of scientific realism pivots on this distinction, and the results of this case will help to articulate the epistemically important factors in assessing theoretical claims.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
History
Authors
Peter Kosso,