Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1160817 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A | 2008 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
Although in the past three decades interest in mathematical explanation revived, recent literature on the subject seems to neglect the strict connection between explanation and discovery. In this paper I sketch an alternative approach that takes such connection into account. My approach is a revised version of one originally considered by Descartes. The main difference is that my approach is in terms of the analytic method, which is a method of discovery prior to axiomatized mathematics, whereas Descartes’s approach is in terms of the analytic–synthetic method, which is a heuristic pattern in already axiomatized mathematics.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
History
Authors
Carlo Cellucci,