Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1160820 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A | 2008 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
The paper introduces precise definitions of the inevitabilist and contingentist positions. On this basis, it reveals the analytical structure and some inherent difficulties of the contingentist/inevitabilist issue. It then discusses some of these difficulties, relying on the thought-experiment of a ‘divided physics’ (two successful physics that have developed in complete isolation from each other). Along the way, it investigates the kinds of differences that two alternative physics should present, if they are to give rise to non-benign forms of contingentism.
Related Topics
Social Sciences and Humanities
Arts and Humanities
History
Authors
Léna Soler,