Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1161121 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics | 2016 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
•Everettian Quantum Theory.•Chance.•Decision Theory.•State Supervenience.
Everettian quantum mechanics faces the challenge of how to make sense of probability and probabilistic reasoning in a setting where there is typically no unique outcome of measurements. Wallace has built on a proof by Deutsch to argue that a notion of probability can be recovered in the many worlds setting. In particular, Wallace argues that a rational agent has to assign probabilities in accordance with the Born rule. This argument relies on a rationality constraint that Wallace calls state supervenience. I argue that state supervenience is not defensible as a rationality constraint for Everettian agents unless we already invoke probabilistic notions.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Physics and Astronomy (General)
Authors
Lina Jansson,