Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1161156 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics | 2015 | 16 Pages |
•A “local” account of inter-theoretic reduction in physics is given.•Local reduction between theories relies on multiple context-specific derivations.•These derivations concern relations between models of individual systems.•Where the models are dynamical systems, a broadly Nagelian analysis can be given.
A conventional wisdom about the progress of physics holds that successive theories wholly encompass the domains of their predecessors through a process that is often called “reduction.” While certain influential accounts of inter-theory reduction in physics take reduction to require a single “global” derivation of one theory׳s laws from those of another, I show that global reductions are not available in all cases where the conventional wisdom requires reduction to hold. However, I argue that a weaker “local” form of reduction, which defines reduction between theories in terms of a more fundamental notion of reduction between models of a single fixed system, is available in such cases and moreover suffices to uphold the conventional wisdom. To illustrate the sort of fixed-system, inter-model reduction that grounds inter-theoretic reduction on this picture, I specialize to a particular class of cases in which both models are dynamical systems. I show that reduction in these cases is underwritten by a mathematical relationship that follows a certain liberalized construal of Nagel/Schaffner reduction, and support this claim with several examples. Moreover, I show that this broadly Nagelian analysis of inter-model reduction encompasses several cases that are sometimes cited as instances of the “physicist׳s” limit-based notion of reduction.