Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1161321 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics | 2006 | 7 Pages |
Abstract
Against Pooley [(2006a). A hole revolution, or are we back where we started? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37(2) (this issue)], I stand firm on my claim that a hole argument can be constructed in the framework of loop quantum gravity. In this brief response, I shall attempt to make it clearer why this is so, and try to pinpoint and diagnose the main points of disagreement between us.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Physics and Astronomy (General)
Authors
Dean Rickles,