Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1161723 | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics | 2006 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Boltzmann's approach to statistical mechanics is widely believed to be conceptually superior to Gibbs' formulation. However, the microcanonical distribution often fails to behave as expected: the ergodicity of the motion relative to it can rarely be established for realistic systems; worse, it can often be proved to fail. Also, the approach involves idealizations that have little physical basis. Here we take Khinchin's advice and propose a definition of equilibrium that is more realistic: the definition reflects the fact that the system is made of a great number of particles, and implies that all measurable macroscopic observables have steady values.
Keywords
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Physics and Astronomy (General)
Authors
Itamar Pitowsky,