Unraveling protein stabilization mechanisms: Vitrification and water replacement in a glass transition temperature controlled system

The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of the two main mechanisms used to explain the stabilization of proteins by sugar glasses during drying and subsequent storage: the vitrification and the water replacement theory. Although in literature protein stability is often attributed to either vitrification or water replacement, both mechanisms could play a role and they should be considered simultaneously. A model protein, alkaline phosphatase, was incorporated in either inulin or trehalose by spray drying. To study the storage stability at different glass transition temperatures, a buffer which acts as a plasticizer, ammediol, was incorporated in the sugar glasses. At low glass transition temperatures (< 50 °C), the enzymatic activity of the protein strongly decreased during storage at 60 °C. Protein stability increased when the glass transition temperature was raised considerably above the storage temperature. This increased stability could be attributed to vitrification. A further increase of the glass transition temperature did not further improve stability. In conclusion, vitrification plays a dominant role in stabilization at glass transition temperatures up to 10 to 20 °C above storage temperature, depending on whether trehalose or inulin is used. On the other hand, the water replacement mechanism predominately determines stability at higher glass transition temperatures.

► Mechanisms for stabilization of a protein by sugar glasses are investigated. ► The two main mechanisms considered are vitrification and water replacement. ► Both mechanisms are distinguished by varying the glass transition temperature (Tg). ► Vitrification determined stability at Tg's up to 20 °C above storage temperature. ► Water replacement determined stability at Tg's well above storage temperature.