Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1180226 | Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems | 2006 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
For a long time, statistical tests of significance have tested a null hypothesis of the form, H0: μ1 = μ2. However, in many cases, it is more important whether a null hypothesis of the form, H0: μ1 â μ2, is rejected or not. When the former hypothesis is judged, no null hypotheses are accepted if the sample size of a data set is sufficiently large. In order to avoid this problem, and to judge instead the latter hypothesis, a fixed Î test has been often used. However, the fixed Î test has some problems. For example, the fixed Î test is only appropriate for testing averages or ratios. In addition, the test requires Î to be specified in advance, even if the tester must specify Î subjectively. Thus, more objective procedures for judging the null hypothesis, H0: μ1 â μ2, are required. In this study, we suggest new procedures which enable us to judge the null hypothesis, H0: μ1 â μ2, without specifying Î in advance using a re-sampling method. Our new procedures are widely applicable to various statistics, and enable us to obtain confidence intervals of confidence intervals. Moreover, by the application of these new procedures to simulation trials, we further demonstrate that the procedures have sufficient statistical power.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry
Authors
Kousuke Okamoto, Makiko Higashi, Masahiko Yokota, Rika Nishikiori, Mie Osaki, Teruo Yasunaga, Tatsuya Takagi,