| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1227319 | Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology | 2016 | 6 Pages |
•The mussels P. perna tend to bioaccumulate heavy metals more efficiently than scallops N. nodusus.•Guanabara Bay and Sepetiba Bay were considered the most impacted between ecosystems studied.•Area of upwelling presents higher Cd values than other regions that are considered hot spot metals.•Bivalves were not suitable for human consumption, because the concentrations of Cu and Cr, in accordance with the limits established by the Brazilian Agency (ANVISA).•When it is considered the maximum individual intake of the studied bivalves, values were considered above normal consumption of the population.
This work aimed to investigate metal bioaccumulation by mussels (Perna perna) and Lion's Scallop (Nodipecten nodosus) farmed in tropical bays, in order to estimate spatial and temporal variation in the exposure to these elements, as well as human health risk. The concentration of each measured element was considered for this evaluation, using maximum residue level (MRL) in foods established by the Brazilian (ANVISA), American (USFDA) and European Communities (EC) legislations. Values for estimated daily ingestion (EDI) were determined for metals intake through mussel and scallop consumption. These estimates were compared with the reference value of (PTDI) proposed by World Health Organization (WHO). Trace elements concentration was measured on ninety mussels P. perna (tissue) and ninety Lion's Scallop N. nodosus (muscle and gonad) reared in four different tropical areas of the Southeast Brazilian coast, between 2009 and 2010. Zinc (Zn), Iron (Fe), Copper (Cu), Manganese (Mn), Chrome (Cr), Nickel (Ni), Cadmium (Cd) and Lead (Pb) concentrations were measured by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after acid mineralization. Cd and Mn were more efficiently bioaccumulated by scallops than mussels and the opposite was found for Fe, Cu and Ni. Guanabara Bay and Sepetiba Bay were considered the most impacted between ecosystems studied. Higher Cd values in Arraial do Cabo in the other sites studied were associated with upwelling that occurs in the region. Consumption of both species cannot be considered safe, because the Cu and Cr concentrations, in accordance with the limits established by the Brazilian Agency (ANVISA). On the other hand, any EDI value exceeded the corresponding value of the PTDI, proposed by World Health Organization (WHO).
