Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1242095 Talanta 2014 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Selective enzymatic reaction using horse-radish peroxidase was automated.•Propofol was determined in the sequential injection system.•Spectrophotometric detection was compared with the fluorescence method.•Propofol was determined in emulsion formulation with sufficient recovery.•Determination was direct without any sample pre-treatment just dilution.

In this work, an application of an enzymatic reaction for the determination of the highly hydrophobic drug propofol in emulsion dosage form is presented. Emulsions represent a complex and therefore challenging matrix for analysis. Ethanol was used for breakage of a lipid emulsion, which enabled optical detection. A fully automated method based on Sequential Injection Analysis was developed, allowing propofol determination without the requirement of tedious sample pre-treatment. The method was based on spectrophotometric detection after the enzymatic oxidation catalysed by horseradish peroxidase and subsequent coupling with 4-aminoantipyrine leading to a coloured product with an absorbance maximum at 485 nm. This procedure was compared with a simple fluorimetric method, which was based on the direct selective fluorescence emission of propofol in ethanol at 347 nm.Both methods provide comparable validation parameters with linear working ranges of 0.005–0.100 mg mL−1 and 0.004–0.243 mg mL−1 for the spectrophotometric and fluorimetric methods, respectively. The detection and quantitation limits achieved with the spectrophotometric method were 0.0016 and 0.0053 mg mL−1, respectively. The fluorimetric method provided the detection limit of 0.0013 mg mL−1 and limit of quantitation of 0.0043 mg mL−1. The RSD did not exceed 5% and 2% (n=10), correspondingly. A sample throughput of approx. 14 h−1 for the spectrophotometric and 68 h−1 for the fluorimetric detection was achieved. Both methods proved to be suitable for the determination of propofol in pharmaceutical formulation with average recovery values of 98.1 and 98.5%.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemistry Analytical Chemistry
Authors
, , , , , , ,