Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1422719 Dental Materials 2010 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

Hydrofluoric acid can be used for intra-oral repair of restorations. Contamination of tooth substrate with hydrofluoric acid cannot always be avoided.ObjectivesTo investigate the bonding effectiveness to hydrofluoric acid contaminated dentin by, micro-tensile bond strength testing, SEM and TEM.MethodsFor this study, 15 molar teeth were used of which dentin surfaces were subjected to five, different etching procedures. Group A, 37.5% phosphoric acid (Kerr Gel) (control group); group B, 37.5% phosphoric acid followed by 3% hydrofluoric acid (DenMat); group C, 37.5% phosphoric acid, followed by 9.6% hydrofluoric acid (Pulpdent); group D, 3% hydrofluoric acid followed by 37.5%, phosphoric acid; group E, 9.6% hydrofluoric acid followed by 37.5% phosphoric acid. After the bonding procedure (OptiBond FL, Kerr) a composite resin build-up (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray), was made. After 1 week storage, specimens were prepared for micro-tensile bond testing, SEM- and, TEM-analysis. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey's HSD (p < 0.05).ResultsIn the control group (solely phosphoric acid), the mean μTBS was 53.4 ± 10.6 MPa, which was, significantly higher than any hydrofluoric acid prepared group (group A versus groups B–E, p < 0.001). No, significant differences in μTBS were found between the 3% and 9.6% hydrofluoric acid groups: group B versus group C (13.5 ± 5.5 MPa and 18.7 ± 4.3 MPa, respectively) or group D versus group E (19.9 ± 6.8 MPa and 20.3 ± 4.1 MPa, respectively).SignificanceDue to its adverse effect on the bond strength of composite to dentin, contact of hydrofluoric acid to dentin should be avoided.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Materials Science Biomaterials
Authors
, , , , , , ,