Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1467503 Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 2008 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

Soy protein nanoparticle aggregates were prepared by alkaline hydrolysis of soy protein isolate (SPI). Nanocomposites were formed by mixing hydrolyzed SPI (HSPI) nanoparticle aggregates with styrene–butadiene (SB) latex. At 140 °C, the composites filled with 30% HSPI exhibited roughly a 540- and 9-fold increase in G′ compared to the unfilled SB rubber for the composites prepared at pH 9 and 5.2, respectively. Compared to SPI, the glass transition temperatures and the broadening effect of G″ maxima indicated that HSPI has a stronger filler–polymer interaction and is more homogeneous in its polymer immobilization effect. Strain sweep and recovery experiments indicated HSPI-filled composites had better modulus retention than SPI composites. The model fitting of the reversible strain sweep data indicated that HSPI composites are more elastic, while SPI composites have a higher shear modulus. The model fitting also indicates the composites prepared at pH 5.2 are more elastic, but the composites prepared at pH 9 have a higher modulus. Fractal dimensions estimated from the strain sweep and temperature sweep experiments are in good agreement and indicate HSPI has a more compact aggregate structure than SPI aggregates.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Materials Science Ceramics and Composites
Authors
, ,