Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1507244 | Cryogenics | 2016 | 14 Pages |
•Interactions and matching mechanism between compressor and PTCF are analyzed.•Design methods of PTCF and compressor for optimal match are given, respectively.•New PTCF and compressor are designed to match the given counterparts, respectively.•Good agreements are observed between simulated and tested results in both cases.•Validity of both theoretical modeling and proposed design methods are verified.
The match between the pulse tube cold finger (PTCF) and the linear compressor of the Stirling-type pulse tube cryocooler plays a vital role in optimizing the compressor efficiency and in improving the PTCF cooling performance as well. In this paper, the interaction of them has been analyzed in a detailed way to reveal the match mechanism, and systematic investigations on the two-way matching have been conducted. The design method of the PTCF to achieve the optimal matching for the given compressor and the counterpart design method of the compressor to achieve the optimal matching for the given PTCF are put forward. Specific experiments are then carried out to verify the conducted theoretical analyses and modeling. For a given linear compressor, a new in-line PTCF which seeks to achieve the optimal match is simulated, designed and tested. And for a given coaxial PTCF, a new dual-opposed moving-coil linear compressor is also developed to match with it. The simulated and experimental results are compared, and fairly good agreements are found between them in both cases. The matched in-line cooler with the newly-designed PTCF has capacities of 4–11.84 W at 80 K with higher than 17% of Carnot efficiency and the mean motor efficiency of 81.5%, and the matched coaxial cooler with the new-designed compressor can provide 2–5.5 W at 60 K with higher than 9.6% of Carnot efficiency and the mean motor efficiency of 83%, which verify the validity of the theoretical investigations on the optimal match and the proposed design methods.