Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1551295 Solar Energy 2012 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

A set of general altitude–azimuth tracking angle formulas for a heliostat with a mirror-pivot offset and other geometrical errors were developed previously. The angular parameters with respect to the geometrical errors are the tilt angle, ψt, and the tilt azimuth angle, ψa, of the azimuth axis, the bias angle, τ1, of the altitude axis from the orthogonal to the azimuth axis, and the canting angle, μ, of the mirror surface plane relative to the altitude axis. In view of the importance the zero angle position errors of the two rotational axes (α0 is for the zero angle position error of the altitude axis and γ0 for the zero angle position error of the azimuth axis), the original general tracking angle formulae have been slightly modified by replacing the tracking angles in the original tracking formulas with the difference between the nominal tracking angles and the zero angle position errors. The six angular parameters (ψa, ψt, γ0, τ1, α0, μ) for a specific altitude–azimuth tracking heliostat could be determined from experimental tracking data using a least squares fit and the classical Hartley-Meyer solution algorithm. The least squares model is used on data for a specially designed heliostat model with two sets of laser beam tracking test data to show the effectiveness of the least squares model and the Hartley-Meyer algorithm.

► There are six angular parameters in the general altitude–azimuth tracking formulas. ► A LSF model has been built to determine the six angular parameters for a heliostat. ► Hartley-Meyer algorithm is used to solve the LSF model based on tracking test data. ► Both the LSF model and the Hartley-Meyer algorithm are provided in detail. ► The effectiveness of the LSF model is verified by a laser tracking heliostat model.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Authors
, , , , ,