| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1615542 | Journal of Alloys and Compounds | 2012 | 11 Pages |
This is fourth paper in a series devoted to reanalysis of the non-standard and standard crystal-field (CF) parameter (CFP) sets obtained from various experimental techniques and theoretical models for trivalent rare-earth (RE) ions in high-critical-temperature (high-Tc) superconductors and related systems. In this paper the experimental orthorhombic CFPs, obtained mostly by inelastic neutron scattering techniques and to a lesser extent by magnetic susceptibility and specific heat measurements as well as the respective theoretical CFPs for Er3+, Ho3+, Nd3+, and Pr3+ ions in REBa2Cu3O7−δ compounds, are considered. Several problems identified due to the comparative CFP analysis: (i) confusing notations used for operators and CFPs, (ii) different scaling factors and units used for CFPs, and (iii) lack of clear definitions of the axis systems used to express CFPs, were clarified. For each ion studied the available experimental and theoretical CFP sets are analyzed, standardized, and presented in a unified way. The large number of CFP sets prevents calculation of the five additional alternative sets for each originally reported CFP set. Instead, the alternative CFP sets are determined using the package CST for an average set calculated for selected compatible sets for each ion. These alternative CFP sets may be utilized in the multiple correlated fitting technique to improve reliability of the final fitted CFPs. The present results may facilitate future spectroscopic determination of CFPs as well as increase reliability of fitted and theoretical CFPs for RE3+ ions in high-Tc superconductors REBa2Cu3O7−δ and related systems.
► Orthorhombic crystal field parameters (CFPs) for RE3+ in REBa2Cu3O7−δ studied. ► Comparative analysis of CFP sets for Er3+, Ho3+, Nd3+, and Pr3+ ions performed. ► Aspects related to CFP standardization considered. ► Several problems identified due to comparative CFP analysis clarified. ► Correct comparison of different CFP sets must be based on standardization.
