Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1711275 | Biosystems Engineering | 2013 | 8 Pages |
Abstract
Positive driving performance and ergonomic effects are ascribed to satellite-based automatic guidance systems. Although the literature had provided some information on working-width utilisation, turning-time requirement and steering accuracy, the relevant studies had mostly been carried out on smaller areas of land under experimental conditions. Little information was found on the nearly-always-mentioned reduction in driver workload. A large-scale field trial under practical conditions was carried out in the Czech Republic for the expanded clarification of the driving-performance and ergonomic effects of automatic guidance systems. Various parameters were recorded for 17 drivers with respect to primary tillage, seedbed preparation and sowing both with and without a guidance system. Working widths were between 5 and 15Â m, and field sizes between 1.2 and 15.7Â ha. The findings showed that driving speeds, turning times and working-width utilisation were in some cases more advantageous with a guidance system, but did not differ statistically significantly. The variations caused by driver, field shape and field margins had a greater influence than the use of guidance systems. Two parameters differed significantly, however. Guidance systems increased the average steering accuracy and delivered a lower heart rate. The study confirmed that guidance systems can deliver positive driving-performance effects and can contribute to driver relief.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Control and Systems Engineering
Authors
Martin Holpp, Milan Kroulik, Zdenek Kviz, Thomas Anken, Monika Sauter, Oliver Hensel,