Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1716371 | Acta Astronautica | 2010 | 9 Pages |
Abstract
The argument proposed in this paper is that conventional assumptions which underpin SETI can be revised in ways which permit a more nuanced approach to the enterprise. It is suggested that sensible assumptions based on adventurous science include the notion that we can conjecture helpfully about what we can know about SETI, and that probably the ETIs for which we are looking are sending signals to us because they know they are not alone, and are interested to help us learn that we are not alone. Additionally, existing work using Pulsars as Beacons for SETI is reviewed in the context of what we can now call asymmetric SETI, the term coined to reflect that we are merely seeking to determine what ETI already knows.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
Authors
William H. Edmondson,