Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
1734100 Energy 2012 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

Options for exporting natural gas from stranded oil and gas fields to markets include pipelines, LNG (liquefied natural gas), CNG (compressed natural gas), GTL (gas to liquids), GTS (gas to solids), and GTW (gas to wire). Thus, the key question is which option is the most robust in ensuring the security of investment over a project life cycle against market fluctuations, trade embargos, political changes, technical advances, etc. Excluding pipelines, LNG, CNG, and GTL have attracted increasing investor attention during the last two decades. Although studies abound on economic comparisons of these processes, a systematic method to address this important problem in the presence of uncertainty seems missing in the literature. This work presents such a method based on decision analysis cycle and considers oil and gas prices as uncertain. Using NPV (net present value) as the decision criterion, it presents the computation of “expected NPV” of each gas utilization alternative to identify the best option. It includes the entire well-to-market supply chain, from extraction, conversion, and transportation, to re-conversion at the target market. Finally, it identifies the sweet spots for LNG, CNG, and GTL alternatives for different reservoir capacities and market distances.

► Introduction of DA (Decision Analysis) cycle for systematic techno-economic study of natural gas utilization. ► Development of economic model for well-to-market supply chains of LNG, CNG and GTL. ► Decision-support tool for upstream natural gas field development considering uncertainties. ► Quantitative identification of the sweet spot for each natural gas utilization option.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Energy Energy (General)
Authors
, ,