Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1755061 | Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering | 2014 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
Simulations at the reservoir scale show that the lowest oil recovery for a water-wet case is obtained when a single fluid (gas or water) is injected; WAG injection yields significantly higher recovery factors. If the reservoir is oil-wet, however, pure gas injection results in the highest oil recovery. Overall, field-scale recovery predictions are very sensitive to the combination of both, different geological models and different three-phase relative permeability functions. Comparing recovery factors for network-derived and empirical relative permeability models demonstrates that the uncertainty in predicting oil recovery resulting from the choice of three-phase relative permeability models can be as large as the geological uncertainty present in a model that has been history matched using production data from a prolonged waterflood. This implies that the choice of three-phase flow functions directly affects the viability of WAG projects.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Economic Geology
Authors
Adnan Al-Dhahli, Sebastian Geiger, Marinus I.J. van Dijke,