Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1763048 | Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology | 2006 | 10 Pages |
Abstract
Previously, the temperature rise (ÎT) caused by diagnostic ultrasound and the AUIM/NEMA-defined thermal indices were examined to evaluate whether these indices were reasonable indicators of potential bioeffects due to ultrasound heating in the absence of a residual temperature rise (RTR). In our study, ÎT induced by diagnostic ultrasound exposures was estimated in the presence of an RTR using the Bioheat Transfer Equation. To evaluate ÎT/TIS in the presence of an RTR, 11 frequencies, eight cooling times, eight insonation times for the second ultrasound examination, and three source powers for a circular aperture (Aaprtâ¤1 cm2) were investigated. In our comparison of the ratios of ÎT/TIS in the absence and presence of an RTR, a higher ÎT/TIS value was obtained in the examination with the RTR. We showed that the ÎT/TIS value is equal to 2.88 in the presence of an RTR, whereas the ÎT/TIS value without the RTR equals 1.90. In the presence of the RTR, although the TIS does not inform the user of higher ultrasound heating due to TIS values that do not exceed 1.00, ÎT reaches 2.62°C, and the ÎT without the RTR reaches 1.68°C in the case of a TIS value that does not exceed 1.00. These results suggest that, for nonscanned mode situations where soft tissue is insonated, the TIS should not be regarded as a reliable indicator of potential bioeffects due to ultrasound heating in the presence of the RTR. Our study also indicates the necessity for a new indicator that provides the clinical user with accurate in vivo temperature rise feedback (possibly even true ÎT), and includes adding an exposure time component to the Bio-Heat Equation model. (E-mail: irfankaragoz@gazi.edu.tr)
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Authors
ÌIrfan Karagoz, M. Kemal Kartal,