Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
1780648 | NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics | 2013 | 11 Pages |
Abstract
The first magnetic component obtained from the two older formations is considered primary, as the corresponding pole reflects the age when compared with the previously obtained Cretaceous poles for North Africa. On other hand, the second pole obtained from the Maghrabi formation (the younger) is inconsistent with the Cretaceous pole positions for North Africa, but falls closer to the Eocene pole indicating that the rocks of this formation could have suffered remagnetization during the late Eocene time.
Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Physics and Astronomy
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Authors
H. El-Shayeb, I.A. El-Hemaly, E. Abdel Aal, A. Saleh, A. Khashaba, H. Odah, R. Mostafa,