Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
189188 Electrochimica Acta 2011 15 Pages PDF
Abstract

The anodic dissolution of U and Zr metal was studied in LiCl–KCl–UCl3 and LiCl–KCl–ZrCl4, respectively, at 773 K by cyclic voltammetry and compared with their respective dissolution behaviour in blank LiCl–KCl eutectic. The anodic dissolution of U–Zr alloy in LiCl–KCl–UCl3 was also studied at 773 K to compare with the dissolution of U and Zr. The transfer coefficients evaluated by Tafel analysis and the method of Allen–Hickling for U and Zr dissolution were found to be in fair agreement with each other. U dissolution in LiCl–KCl–UCl3 and Zr dissolution LiCl–KCl–ZrCl4 were also studied by chronoamperometry and the diffusion coefficient value of U3+ was calculated to be in the range of 2.9 × 10−5 to 3.3 × 10−5 cm2 s−1 which is in agreement with those reported in literature. Convolution voltammetric analysis of Zr4+/Zr2+ redox couple in LiCl–KCl–ZrCl4 was carried out for the first time to have a comprehensive understanding of the electrode kinetics.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering (General)
Authors
, , , , , , ,