Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
---|---|---|---|---|
2070079 | Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology | 2015 | 12 Pages |
Abstract
In this paper I provide an overview of Husserl's and Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological critique of science, and suggest that such a critique is not only necessary in order to resolve an aporia that is otherwise apparently endemic to science, but that such a critique may also offer resources for productively addressing related philosophical difficulties, particularly the relationship between ideality and materiality/“nature.” Following Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, I maintain that only a phenomenologically grounded science can be consistently “scientific.”
Related Topics
Life Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Biophysics
Authors
Jonathan D. Singer,