| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2070079 | Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology | 2015 | 12 Pages | 
Abstract
												In this paper I provide an overview of Husserl's and Merleau-Ponty's phenomenological critique of science, and suggest that such a critique is not only necessary in order to resolve an aporia that is otherwise apparently endemic to science, but that such a critique may also offer resources for productively addressing related philosophical difficulties, particularly the relationship between ideality and materiality/“nature.” Following Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, I maintain that only a phenomenologically grounded science can be consistently “scientific.”
Related Topics
												
													Life Sciences
													Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
													Biophysics
												
											Authors
												Jonathan D. Singer, 
											