| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2159150 | Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2010 | 5 Pages |
ObjectiveTo evaluate efficacy of 18F-FDG PET(CT) in the staging and re staging of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, its potential role in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy.Patients and methodsPatients with confirmed diagnosis of rectal cancer (T2–4 or N+) were prospectively studied with 18F-FDG PET before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Surgery was programmed 4–6 weeks after treatment followed by an expert histological analysis of the surgical specimen. Response to neoadjuvant treatment was assessed using two specific variables: difference in SUV (difSUV) pre/post-neoadjuvant treatment and response index (RI).ResultsA total of 64 patients were enrolled for pathological and bio-metabolic response assessment. Compared to cN0, cN+ patients had a higher SUV1 mean value (6.5 vs. 7.6, p = 0.04) and ypN+ patients had higher SUV2 mean values (2.4 vs 3.5, p = 0.06). difSUV values of ⩾4 was the most efficient diagnostic parameter (sensitivity = 45.8%, specificity = 86.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 73.3%, negative predictive value(NPV) = 65.7%). With an RI of 66.6%, the sensitivity was 38.5%, specificity = 81.5%, PPV = 66.6%, and NPV = 57.8%. Patients who experienced disease progression had an RI ⩽ 66% and a difSUV ⩽ 4.Conclusion18F-FDG PET has proven to be an accurate diagnostic technique for assessing rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy. The results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were similar, if not superior, to those reported with other diagnostic imaging techniques.
