Safety and biodistribution study of bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cells and mononuclear cells and the impact of the administration route in an intact porcine model

Background aimsBone marrow mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) and bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem stromal cells (BM-MSCs) could have therapeutic potential for numerous conditions, including ischemia-related injury. Cells transplanted intravascularly may become entrapped in the lungs, which potentially decreases their therapeutic effect and increases the risk for embolism.MethodsTwelve pigs were divided into groups of 3 and received 99mTc- hydroxymethyl-propylene-amine-oxime–labeled autologous BM-MNCs or allogeneic BM-MSCs by either intravenous (IV) or intra-arterial (IA) transplantation. A whole body scan and single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) were performed 8 h later, and tissue biopsies were collected for gamma counting. A helical CT scan was also performed on 4 pigs to detect possible pulmonary embolism, 2 after IV BM-MSC injection and 2 after saline injection.ResultsThe transplantation route had a greater impact on the biodistribution of the BM-MSCs than the BM-MNCs. The BM-MNCs accumulated in the spleen and bones, irrespective of the administration route. The BM-MSCs had relatively higher uptake in the kidneys. The IA transplantation decreased the deposition of BM-MSCs in the lungs and increased uptake in other organs, especially in the liver. Lung atelectases were frequent due to mechanical ventilation and attracted transplanted cells. CT did not reveal any pulmonary embolism.ConclusionsBoth administration routes were found to be safe, but iatrogenic atelectasis might be an issue when cells accumulate in the lungs. The IA administration is effective in avoiding pulmonary entrapment of BM-MSCs. The cell type and administration method both have a major impact on the acute homing.