Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
222683 Journal of Food Engineering 2016 10 Pages PDF
Abstract

•The food engineering (FE) profession is at a crossroads.•Most respondents indicated that FE should be part of another program.•FE education was preferred over food science.•More than two-thirds ranked FE higher than food science.•FE should implement paradigm shifts in pursuing excellence and innovation.

A global web survey was conducted collecting academia and industry perceived attitudes, identifying curriculum gaps, challenges and opportunities of food engineering (FE). Participation criterion was: “A person who has one or more formal degrees in FE, and/or an equivalent degree in another field and whose job description includes/included FE activities”. Respondents with formal FE education was lower than 25%. More than two-thirds of the respondents holding a formal BSc or MSc in FE selected other domains for their higher degrees, and 56.7% indicated that FE should become a part of another study program. Traditional FE topics were preferred over health, nutrition and wellbeing, innovation related to firm's activities, marketing molecular biology. FE profession should undergo a self-examination required to ensure its future growth and impact in addressing forthcoming challenges in the food sector, and concurrently make paradigm shifts in its vision in the pursuit of excellence and innovation.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering (General)
Authors
, ,