Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
222720 Journal of Food Engineering 2016 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Stable lutein nanodispersions were formed using solvent displacement method.•Stable lutein nanodispersions were formed using high-pressure valve homogenization.•Formulation parameters generally had significant effect on particle size.•Better lutein retention in nanodispersion formed using solvent displacement method.•Solvent displacement method is a good alternative to high-pressure homogenization.

In this study, we compared the effect of formulation parameters on the physicochemical properties of lutein nanodispersions prepared using a low- and high-energy approach, i.e., solvent displacement (SD) and high-pressure valve homogenization (HPH), respectively. The lutein concentration had a significant effect on the particle size (PS) and particle size distribution (PSD) of nanodispersions that were prepared by using both methods. However, Tween 80 concentration and organic-phase-to-aqueous-phase volume ratio (OAR) only had a significant effect on the PS of nanodispersions prepared by SD. Under all the variations in the formulation parameters, the PSs and PSDs of nanodispersions prepared by SD and HPH were not significantly different. At 0.1% lutein concentration, 0.1% Tween 80 concentration and OAR of 1:9, the nanodispersions prepared by using both methods displayed minimum PS and excellent lutein retentions (>90%). This study showed that SD is a suitable alternative to HPH for preparing lutein nanodispersions.

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering (General)
Authors
, , , , , ,