Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
235719 Powder Technology 2015 12 Pages PDF
Abstract

•Time-averaging of transient E–E CFD simulations of 3D BFB, TFB and CFB flows was done.•Time-averaged drag force was calculated in each mesh point in 32 simulations.•Voidage, location, gas and solid properties and velocities affect the drag force.•Drag corrections calculated from 2D and 3D CFD results significantly differ.

In the present work, a qualitative analysis of the time-averaged gas–solid drag force in gas–solid fluidized beds is carried out. The analysis is based on a large number of transient Eulerian–Eulerian 3D CFD simulations of small bubbling, turbulent and circulating fluidized beds. The obtained results significantly differ from corresponding data previously obtained from 2D simulations, especially at high solid concentrations. This confirms that to accurately model the gas–solid drag force in a steady state 3D simulation, the drag model should not be based on data from transient 2D simulations. In the present work, the average drag force is expressed as the product of the drag force calculated from time-averaged velocities and volume fractions and a correction coefficient. The study shows that even when the third dimension is described in the mesh with only three nodes, the 3D character of the flow is captured in the drag correction coefficient. Thus, a large number of parametric studies could be carried out in a reasonable time frame. In the paper, the parameters affecting the time-averaged drag force are identified and the nature of the effects are analyzed. The analysis shows that solid volume fraction, particle size, solid density, gas viscosity, the slip velocity between gas and solids and the lateral distance to a wall have significant effects on the drag correction coefficient. At high gas densities typical e.g. of pressurized fluidization even the gas density has significant effects. A closure relation for the time-averaged drag force for a wide range of fluidization conditions should include these seven variables as inputs.

Graphical abstractFigure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide

Related Topics
Physical Sciences and Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering (General)
Authors
, , ,