| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 236789 | Powder Technology | 2013 | 8 Pages |
Characterization of powder consolidation and flow is important to a large number of industries that process solids. A variety of powder testers exist today, however most are application specific and results they provide are mainly qualitative. Comparison studies have been attempted previously; their main focus was whether various methods correlate, while the reasons for disagreement in the results have seldom been investigated.Among the different methods used to characterize powder flow behavior, density-based methods are some of the simplest and most popular. They are also some of the least sensitive and least reproducible. A method comparison study was performed to characterize the variability in bulk density as measured by various powder flow characterization methods. It was found that the density of the powders tested in most unconsolidated methods had a near-perfect linear correlation with one another, suggesting that there exists a critical “dilated” density value that is independent of the measurement method and can be considered a material property. The densities of the powders in consolidated states correlated poorly, especially for the methods where consolidation mechanisms were not tightly controlled (i.e. tapping). In addition, the effect of the consolidation state of the powder bed during testing on cohesion measurements was studied. The cohesion measured by shear cells at differing consolidation states and by an avalanching method, during which the powder bed is dilated, were compared. It was found that the differences in cohesion results from the shear cells tested can be attributed to differences in the powder consolidation state. Cohesion results acquired from a dilated powder bed correlate more linearly with the shear cell cohesion results at low consolidation stresses than at high consolidation stresses; further supporting the impact of the powder bed packing state on the measurement of cohesion.
Graphical abstractThe cohesion as measured by a shear cell correlates linearly with flow behavior measured in a dilated state; the behavior observed at low consolidation forces is constant across measurement techniques.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights► A density may exist that is a material property independent of measurement method. ► Bulk density of a mixture is dependent on the volume of the most cohesive component. ► For the cases studied here, consolidation history impacts shear stress measurements. ► Cohesion is dependent on the consolidation state for the materials studied here.
