Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2551344 Life Sciences 2014 5 Pages PDF
Abstract

AimsTo compare the effects of two of the most effective lipid-lowering therapies with similar LDL-cholesterol reduction capacity on the innate and adaptive immune responses through the evaluation of autoantibodies anti-oxidized LDL (anti-oxLDL Abs) and electronegative LDL [LDL(−)] levels.Main methodsWe performed a prospective, randomized, open label study, with parallel arms and blinded endpoints. One hundred and twelve subjects completed the study protocol and received rosuvastatin 40 mg or ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 mg for 12 weeks. Lipids, apolipoproteins, LDL(−), and anti-oxLDL Abs (IgG) were assayed at baseline and end of study.Key findingsMain clinical and laboratory characteristics were comparable at baseline. Lipid modifications were similar in both treatment arms, however, a significant raise in anti-oxLDL Abs levels was observed in subjects treated with rosuvastatin (p = 0.026 vs. baseline), but not in those receiving simvastatin/ezetimibe. (p = 0.233 vs. baseline), thus suggesting modulation of adaptive immunity by a potent statin. Titers of LDL(−) were not modified by the treatments.SignificanceConsidering atherosclerosis as an immune disease, this study adds new information, showing that under similar LDL-cholesterol reduction, the choice of lipid-lowering therapy can differently modulate adaptive immune responses.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Authors
, , , , , , , , ,