| Article ID | Journal | Published Year | Pages | File Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 259264 | Construction and Building Materials | 2011 | 7 Pages |
In this study, the stress–strain-behaviour of self-compacting concrete (SCC) and conventionally vibrated concrete (CVC) is compared. The influence of the paste volume and the cement type on E-modulus, flexural and compressive strengths, drying shrinkage, creep and stress development under restrained conditions is investigated on three SCC mixtures and three mixtures of CVC with identical water-to-cement-ratio. SCC reaches lower values for E-modulus, compressive and flexural strengths but higher values for shrinkage, creep and strain under restrained conditions. Besides the paste volume, the cement type plays a fundamental role regarding creep. Composite models were applied for comparisons and were able to predict the differences in E-modulus and shrinkage between CVC and SCC.
Research highlights► Free shrinkage, creep and restraint stress of CVC and SCC mixtures are compared. ► SCC reaches lower values for E-modulus, compressive and flexural strengths. ► Shrinkage, creep and strain under restrained conditions are higher compared to CVC. ► Cement type considerably affects creep. ► Composite models can predict the differences in E-modulus and shrinkage between CVC and SCC.
