Article ID Journal Published Year Pages File Type
2624765 Manual Therapy 2015 7 Pages PDF
Abstract

•The reliability of the modified Scapular Assistance test (mSAT) was investigated.•The mSAT was performed with and without additional handheld weights.•Reliability measures for both testing procedures showed substantial agreement.•The mSAT with and without weights can be considered as reliable for clinical use.

Study designProspective, blinded interrater reliability study.ObjectiveTo determine the interrater reliability of the modified Scapular Assistance Test (mSAT) with and without the use of additional handheld weights.Methods110 Shoulder patients with various shoulder pathologies were consecutively recruited. Tests were performed independently and randomly on each participant by 2 different examiners, which were blinded to further clinical information (e.g. patient history, former diagnostic results). Percent agreement, Cohen's kappa (Κ), proportion of positive/negative agreement, maximum Κ, prevalence and bias indexes and prevalence-adjusted-bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) were calculated as estimates of interrater reliability of the mSAT with and without additional handheld weights. Weights were chosen according to body weight.ResultsThe reliability measures for the mSAT (Cohen's Κ: 0.68, confidence interval (CI): 0.51–0.85; PABAK: 0.78, CI: 0.67–0.90) as well as for the mSAT with handheld weights (Cohen's Κ: 0.63, CI: 0.44–0.81; PABAK: 0.76, CI: 0.64–0.88) showed substantial agreement according to the classification system proposed by Landis and Koch.ConclusionsBased on the results of this study, the mSAT with and without additional weights can be considered as reliable for clinical use. Since both tests showed substantial agreement, the use of additional handheld weights might not be necessary in case of obvious scapula dyskinesis. However, to perform the mSAT with/without additional weights should depend not only on its reliability values.Name of the public trials registry and the registration number: German Clinical Trials Register, protocol number DRKS00005377.

Related Topics
Health Sciences Medicine and Dentistry Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Authors
, , , ,